Scilence is golden

Luo seems this time the United States is bent on returning to Asia. He believes that the Obama administration will be the U.S. military shift to the Asia-Pacific region, there are four purposes:
<- more ->

First, to maintain U.S. global leadership, China’s rise not suited to the United States, the United States worried that China shake its status.

The United States is eager to maintain hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region, indicating the presence of the United States, does not allow an exclusive pattern of political, economic, and security forces in the Asia-Pacific region.

Chinese take-off wings, south of ASEAN, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in the north, but the two regional organizations are not the United States, the United States therefore afraid of China crowding out.

Second, take the ride, and of the rapid development in the Asia-Pacific to solve domestic economic difficulties. In the situation of global economic growth, weak, and into Europe’s debt crisis in Europe compared to Asia-Pacific region to become prompted the speed of the engine of global economic, more than half of U.S. foreign investment and trade in the Asia-Pacific region, therefore, the strategic focus of the United States is bound to tilt to the Asia-Pacific region.

Three, to stir up trouble in the Asia-Pacific region, the use of contradiction cliques. Five military alliance of US-Japan, U.S. and South Korea, the United States and Australia, the United States in the Asia-Pacific region recently, the United States with some of the South China Sea countries to strengthen military ties.

One of the U.S. The aim is to send a signal to them, although the United States to slash military spending, but the U.S. does not reduce their security commitments.

China as the main rival is not an American President will, but the continuation of the Cold War mentality.

Establishment of new China, President Truman made his famous Truman Doctrine, the core idea is to curb the expansion of communism in the world, Obama proposed a return to the Asia-Pacific is a continuation of this idea.

Fourth, in the Asia-Pacific region ahead of the layout plan to curb the rise of China. Although some U.S. officials admitting their guilt,

You look around, the United States in the Asia-Pacific region to strengthen the alliance relationship with the five adjust the group’s deployment of the five military bases, military bases around China to seek more rights to access, strategic partners to develop more usable and resources, to strengthen against China strategic reconnaissance and joint military exercises, who believe this is not aimed at China? Not the return of the Cold War mentality?

Trouble

Ass to the offensive

General Luo Yuan, is not optimistic about the Obama administration’s wishful thinking. He said the U.S. defense strategy adjustment in the adjustment of strategic systolic, seemingly aggressive, in fact, based on the offensive. The reason there are three:

First, the strategic adjustment is belated adjustment. 1990s after the Kosovo war, the United States that has basically the Balkans settle the strategic balance in order to maintain global strategic balance, the original European focus can be tilted towards the Asia-Pacific region.

However, due to the Therefore, this adjustment is the last adjustment to continue, but this adjustment does not mean that the U.S. has been

Speakman, geopolitical strategists, who ruled Europe and Asia, whoever controls the fate of the world. Eurasian balance of power will directly affect the United States, the United States will not set Europe the expense, it will still

Second, the strategic adjustment is the upset of the U.S. economic downturn. The strategic adjustment of the United States during the Cold War and a serious confrontation in the former Soviet Union and the strategic adjustment in the latter part of the Vietnam War, mostly in the strategic expansion of the initiative to adjust.

This adjustment in the U.S. economy was the financial crisis hit the economy to enhance fatigue, high unemployment, facing budget slashed under the pressure of a passive adjustment.

American military power, economic strength has always been backed by the current economic problems, impecunious, had to downsize its military personnel. Even own military difficulties the United States how much capital for the Asia-Pacific region?

Third, this adjustment is that the U.S. experienced after the war in Iraq and Afghanistan war strategy contraction. The two wars consumed much of the U.S. financial and material resources, the after-effects of war have long plagued the United States.

The United States realized that it has no longer able to adhere to the

The United States have been impossible fingers spread, he must hold the rope fist, which is called the U.S. enemies too, are very hard to press the gourd dipper float. Military strategic focus towards the Asia-Pacific region,

Luo Yuan, general emphasized that the United States to return to the Asia-Pacific, will not bring security to the region, will be turbulent, he asked, said: It will give the Asia-Pacific region to bring peace and tranquility?

U.S. military to return to the Asia-Pacific

Or a major strategic error

Early last month, the U.S. Navy combat Minister Jonathan Greenert said the United States more than 1/3 the number of warships will be transferred to the Western Pacific Region.

Luo Yuan, Response:

The …… the United States is now a total of 11 carriers in the Middle East on the deployment of three, but also while several housekeeping nursing homes, this is the case, sending third aircraft carrier to the Western Pacific Region is very difficult.

Luo Yuan, a reminder:

Luo explained that the wrong time refers to the themes of our times is peace and development, rely on the gunboat policy can not be unsuccessful in the long term;

Wrong place, there are still a threat to U.S. homeland security, the Middle East crisis-ridden, this time to return to the Asia-Pacific is not a wise choice;

The wrong opponent is to choose China as a strategic imaginary enemy, is equivalent to choose a defeated opponent, because the Chinese nation indomitable spirit.

The last century, the 1950s Korean War, weapons disparities, we still win, not to mention a quantum leap in China’s national strength has been.

Focused their attention on Japan

Guard against the Japanese military movements

It comes to Japan in recent years, military action frequently, Luo suggested:

Luo Yuan, general that there are five main performance. First, the recent relaxation of the three principles of arms export to get rid of the shackles of the post-war constitution to become a so-called normal country.

Second, Japan is to relax the demilitarization restrictions involved in international peacekeeping and as an excuse to send troops overseas. Japan has to dispatch peacekeepers in southern Sudan still in Djibouti to establish military bases, this is a breakthrough after the war to its limit.

Third, adjust the defense principle, for the intention of the Chinese. End of last year Japan’s defense ministry announced the Japanese defense of the new principle, stressed the southwest deployment and dynamic defense, deployment of the center of gravity from the northeast to adjust to the southwest tentacles out into the distance from China’s Taiwan region is only more than 100 nautical miles of and Yonaguni Island, also Patriot 3 missiles into Okinawa.

Fourth, Japan is quietly expanding arms. Japanese submarines from 16 to 22 class helicopter destroyer

Japan would also like to engage in a helicopter destroyers of 24,000 tons, the ship is reserved for take-off of fixed-wing fighter space, said the destroyer, in fact, all light aircraft carriers, in violation of the post-war restrictions, contrary to the post-war Japan can not have offensive The provisions of the weapons. Recently, the Japanese but also from the United States to buy 42 F35 fighter planes.

Fifth, increase exercise scale. Japan for six large-scale military exercises last year, mainly to China as rivals. Last year, a North soldier – South 7th Armored Division of the Self-Defense Force ace 50,000 long-range attacks of 3000 km, rarely seen in history.

Luo believes that Japan must respect these military movements to the peoples of Asia that its military transparency.

2012 three war risks

Iran war imminent

The top priority of the United States is Iran. Both sides now have to the extent of rattling, Iran to be outdone frequent bright muscle, showing the determination to defend the country’s.

United States continue to challenge Iran’s bottom line, if the two bottom line – of Iran’s nuclear facilities and oil lifeline is a violation by the United States, Iran may at any time to make the necessary counter-measures. The United States and the European Union has made against the Iranian oil embargo measures, has been to challenge Iran’s bottom line.

In addition, the United States and Israel may also make pre-emptive strike, Luo Yuan, general judged that Iran War of 2012 in the high-risk period.

The face of domestic opposition and the pressure of the outside world, Bashar authorities to show the uncompromising attitude, this means that Syria may conflict and the West.

West also has the impulse to overthrow Bashar al-Assad regime, especially the ending of Libya, Gaddafi regime for the Western paradigm of an external interference make their desire a more expansive, we have to focus on Syria situation.

General Luo Yuan, pointed out: the South China Sea to maintain the peaceful status quo, primarily China, to take the result of a policy of restraint and patience.

He stressed that China’s goodwill by some misunderstanding, mistakenly believe that we are to take the island for peace, so insatiable, and it might lead to some unexpected event.

The Korean peninsula’s peace and stability in the common interests of all parties.

Luo Yuan, general view that the Korean Peninsula unrest, adverse parties, the relevant country would like to see the peninsula war. General Luo Yuan, the Korean Peninsula in 2012 to maintain a rough stability.

How to deal with

To be alert to the two to be calm

General Luo Yuan believes that the strategic adjustment of the U.S. for the Chinese side, although the U.S. population head never say that this is for China, but in the Asia-Pacific region, is not China but also who is? Otherwise, the need for Americans so that Lao Shi expedition?

Since the U.S. military against China, that China must make the appropriate response. He suggested that one must be vigilant, two to be calm.

The Luoyuan Jiang emphasized that we should have sense of urgency to maintain a high degree of vigilance on the U.S. military realignment, after all, the defenses can not do without, but no big deal, go its own way.

He believes us to be a rich, two stronger military, to create a favorable external environment, who can do nothing.

U.S. afraid of us? Afraid of China strong and prosperous, so do everything possible to interfere with our development, we chose not to move for its commitment and dedication to seek the development of the United States are afraid do we?

Afraid we have a good external environment, and do everything possible to sow discord, cliques, creating obstacles to our development.

We will have maneuvered skillfully used diplomacy, friends to fight better, to resolve the antithesis of the better. This regard, we should have enough self-confidence. Chinese peace-loving world for all to see.

General Luo Yuan, a sharply pointed out:

He called on the United States are most afraid of us what? Is the fear of a strong national defense,

You said that the Chinese ‘threat’, you must first was not threatened. That is why we turned to the U.S. military focus of the Asia-Pacific’s answer.

In recent years, the U.S. military strategic thinking to do the appropriate preparation for />

It should be justifiably proprietary terminology of ‘anti-intervention’ is not our People’s Liberation Army, the PLA dictionary ‘aggression’, ‘self-defense’.

相关的主题文章：

• troops and critical assets in advance of transfer to 16 degrees south latitude
• according to Yonhap news agency
• such as Canada
• A spokesman for the NATO International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan
• Israeli officials said that if the Israeli authorities decided to attack Iran

Editor’s note the development of military theory level reflects the overall level of national defense and army modernization is an important manifestation of a national military capabilities. Current, a time when our military transformation and the construction of a critical period, a time when our military Under new historical conditions, how solid and promote the operational theory and innovation as the core of our military theory development, completely correct inveterate addiction action on the previous theoretical studies, time and tide wait for no man of spirit to actively seize the commanding heights of the world’s military and ideological game, this article is worth reading.
>
to avoid Insight into the current military theory, I often see some purely formal renovation, ignoring the content innovative. Sometimes, a book re another subject, slightly adjust the structure covered with a coat of the results of innovation. Sometimes, a topic re-change the kinds of statements to be modified slightly to catch a lift of the project application. This theoretical study is basically in the form of wine in new bottles In fact, innovation in military theory is the storm of an idea, the concept of discard of a previous, new concepts, new thinking, new tactics and the recycled and military theory kernel as the basis for deconstruction, remodeling or even subversion, and this intrinsic qualitative change reflected in the expression level of the formation of a new system of discourse and the corresponding form of the face. Accelerate the transformation of our army from mechanization to information technology, military theory research should be especially vigilant against the rigid point of view, new words, old content, new combinations, backward tactics, new formulations, etc.; to really study through information on the characteristics and nature of the war, to grasp the information of the characteristics and laws of the army building, out of mechanized thinking as soon as possible instead of focusing on the courage to break the stereotype of the mechanized operations, combined with our military actually asked the fundamental orientation of the new concept significant point of view and thus form a system of doctrine, to achieve a qualitative leap of our military theory.

reversed Critically examine the theoretical study of our military, to follow and imitate many of the achievements of foreign foreign armies, while the real national and military conditions, to carry out the achievements of independent innovation is relatively small. Some of the humanities will talk about the West, described themselves as the U.S. has become an academic habits, and even take the foreign armies, the results of copying, plagiarism, infringement and other academic misconduct have also occurred. Indeed, the combination of profound changes in the form of war and fighting power generation mode, the foreign armed forces in recent years have proposed a new strategy, deeply rooted in the practice of foreign armies, military, has a distinct political character and very different class characteristics. Theoretical study of our army blindly copy, will not only result in the theory grafted Mao Zedong said, Similarly, to leave the actual talk about innovation in military theory, must be abstract and empty theoretical innovation. In today’s highly developed information, the world’s various military theory divergent views, if not national and military conditions, discern the realistic starting point and the historical position of the national defense and army building, it is easy to be confused by misleading, diametrically opposed, or wishful thinking, it is difficult to come up with genuine results of the theory of the characteristics of our army.

reflection results, fine. In recent years, with our army’s growing emphasis on theoretical research and continue to promote the whole army a variety of research topics, theoretical monographs, endless theoretical results of the different forms of military publications, military practice the idea of ​​long stream of inexhaustible a source. But calm down and careful consideration, in the range of theoretical results truly be called innovative high quality goods, fine handed down is not the proportion occupied by the theoretical results is not big enough. Some units are still blind pursuit of the papers published and the absolute number of project establishment, quality control is lax on academic achievements, identification standards are not high; individual officers in order to improve the outcome of the number, or even fraud, Submission, repeat the project. These are to some extent, contributed to the formation of the academic bubble If the implementation of quality strategy is a business and always maintain the basic rules of the competition alive, then the build quality results is the study of military theory to victory. Catch up with the game of high-tech science and technology, military theory is a fine contest between. Who can create the most innovative, the most valuable quality results, who will be able to firmly occupy the pinnacle of the world’s military theory.

abandon the Continue to strengthen our military theory research and co-ordinating efforts to research the responsibility of management burden is getting heavier and heavier, research managers often through the relatively small, face to face relatively less, more or less the For example, love to sit in their offices, long-term from the research front-line, do not understand the actual situation, do not have the actual problem, the proposed requirements and instructions of individual research managers often lack the pertinence and operability; some research managers often put incorrect service research the positioning of the work, like to find fault with, give orders, the lack of practical initiatives to help front-line research difficult. In fact, military theory research macro guidance calibration direction, but need more practical help to resolve difficulties. For scientific research, all the services of scientific research as a research management must firmly establish all the guarantees required research, awareness of responsibilities, real lend, Fu Xiashen child, threw herself into research first-line to solve problems, adhere to the front guidance, full help, comprehensive, coordinated to the actual action to promote the study of military theory sound and rapid development.

change the In recent years, the whole army attaches great importance to the study of military theory, investment in research funding increased year by year, the current research funding have a nearly 10-fold increase compared to a decade ago. But objectively speaking, the growth rate of the effectiveness of scientific research is far to catch up with the magnitude of additional research funding. In a sense, our military theory research also exist to varying degrees Military theory, there is not enough input, and difficult to have a major innovation. Equivalence relation between the two does not exist, in the absence of scientific management, the lack of the majority of researchers seeking to win the drill to win the mission and responsibility, even if there is a greater investment may not have huge output and military effectiveness. Solve this problem, the PLA officers and men really The great wisdom of creating is often hidden among the masses. Full-time researchers to go into the field, into the practice, the actual research. The second is to The durability of loneliness is a kind of consciousness, willing loneliness is a state. Theoretical studies to have the bench willing to sit for ten years cold The third is to By cultivating a vibrant research environment to promote the study of military theory to the formation of the thriving active situation. The environment is an atmosphere, an atmosphere, the environment not only affects the people, but also imbue them even decided. A good research environment out of enthusiasm, cohesion, and the creativity. Delicate air positive, harmonious and progressive should strive to build theoretical innovation environment of dedication to create a rich research environment, provide a relaxed research platform. Only in this way can our military theory innovation add youth and vitality

相关的主题文章：

• a room in the stern of the vestibule fire
• China may deploy six of the same type of landing craft
• about 700 million yuan
• the U.S. military budget for the project total to $ 553.1 billion
• Russia agreed to supply artillery

Jiangsu, China, February 22 – Kawamura Takashi, Mayor of Nagoya, Japan, February 20, the identity of his father, once the Japanese soldiers in Nanjing War historians, the study of the history of the Nanjing Massacre Member Hu Zoran Japan historical data records and found that his father was in Nanjing, a testament to the absurdity of the Kawamura Takayuki remarks.
<- more ->

Kawamura Takayuki claimed that his father is Japanese army veterans, until the end of the war in Nanjing, trying to deny the Nanjing Massacre to his father, Kawamura Takashi said, once his father Kawamura IGS male Japanese infantry 101 brigades and regiments, one corporal identity of long-term presence in Nanjing. In fact, 1937 years 101 brigades and regiments, 101 Division under the jurisdiction of the Japanese Shanghai Expeditionary Force forces. The division is only a cavalry wing with 16 division fighting in Nanjing, Nanjing Massacre during division the main infantry brigade has been in Zhejiang and Shanghai.

— The Japanese head of the 101 Division Division Saito Mi Ping Hu Zoran queries to a critical historical data too will be operational status report submitted by the imminent withdrawal of the division designation on January 25, 1940, describes the division group combat in China. The report clearly describes the 101 divisions in early December 1937 in Shanghai as the police, starting from the direction toward the Nanjing on December 10, 18 arrived in Huzhou in Zhejiang Province that turned the direction of Jiaxing prepared to participate in offensive Hangzhou. December 24th the following year, 1 mid-May, the division in Hangzhou area, January 23 to return to Shanghai, to June 1938 to replace the 9th Division police Suzhou.

Therefore, Kawamura the IGS men where the infantry 101 brigades and regiments have not been to Nanjing, and more never stationed in Nanjing. If he is in the brigades and regiments, the impossible witnessed the case of Nanjing in December 1937. Moreover, the 101 brigades and regiments of the war more than two years after the return to Japan demobilization, February 1940 repeated, together with the division has been revoked, Kawamura IGS male and 101 brigades and regiments, a corporal identity of long-term presence in Nanjing.

If Kawamura IGS men did indeed stationed in Nanjing, that Japan military history File Overview Japanese Army Wing, he could only to Nanjing in April 1943 the garrison of the Japanese 61 Division 101 Wing soldiers. This 101 Wing had been stationed in Japan, participated in the Battle of Shanghai Infantry 101 brigades and regiments no connection with the foregoing. Assumption Kawamura IGS male in April 1943 with the new Japanese army 101 wing to the Nanjing garrison at this time of the Nanjing Massacre is over five and a half.

Obviously, part of which branch 101 Kawamura IGS male body in the massacre in Nanjing. Famous war history of research experts, the PLA Publishing House barracks cultural world editor I Ge endorse this research.

相关的主题文章：

• On the 20th
• the United States
• the Iranian media reported that the talks were
• and other domestic tour of the Thanksgiving trip . On this year whether there are tour plans
• 此次研究得到了研究重要性的認証

According to Russian Military Review, February 20, the U.S. tied for second, only the column filled with the 5th generation fighter F-22 advanced performance, because of the lack of combat experience and bottom of the rankings, the famous Su-27 could not even list.
<- more ->

Russian media said the main criteria of the U.S. media named the top ten fighters of the last century, in addition to more advanced technical and tactical performance, successful hands-on experience is also essential. In addition to the ultimately selected the Top Ten list of the fighter, all other participating aircraft have participated in combat operations, and each plane, without exception, have some obvious advantages. Of course, not all good aircraft can list. For example, as times of peace the best fighter of all international air show a well-deserved star, able to complete a variety of difficult aerobatic action Su-27 also failed to selected final Mingluosunshan, say that it is a pity. Specific rank as follows:

10: U.S. F-22

F-22 is the world’s only active duty 5th generation of supersonic stealth fighter, under the enemy’s first fight against the enemy, the enemy hit the target first, the idea developed from, equipped with the latest technology and equipment. However, the controversy about the F-22, especially its price, performance and practical significance as the topic of intense debate. Many people have questioned the depth modification of the F-15, F-16 can produce roughly the same effect with the F-22, then why huge sums of money to spend $ 66 billion on the F-22 program? Perhaps because the technology must be developed, can not stop the progress of science and technology. However, the lack of combat experience on the evaluation of the F-22 had a negative impact, this performance is the most advanced fighter can only finished second with 10, bottom of the rankings.

9: German Messerschmitt Me 262

This is the world’s first jet fighter aircraft, maximum speed up to 900 km / h, to achieve a major breakthrough. It can also be used as fighter-interceptors, bombers and reconnaissance aircraft, equipped with four 30 mm cannon, 100 rounds per door, and another 24 rockets. World War II, this aircraft to its allies by virtue of its comprehensive technology and manufacturing processes left very impressed. By the end of World War II, Germany produced a total of 1900 Me 262

8: Soviet MiG -25

MiG-25 supersonic high-altitude interceptor created 29 world records, has no rival in this regard, but its combat performance and less satisfactory. The only time victories U.S. Navy carrier-based fighter of an F/A-18C January 17, 1991, the Iraqi Air Force MiG-25 aircraft destroyed. MiG-25s were used as reconnaissance aircraft even better, during the Arab-Israeli conflict, the Egyptian Air Force MiG-25R reconnaissance to identify all the positions of the army defense line system. 1.7-2.3 million meters of high-altitude high-speed flight in MiG-25, a maximum speed of Mach 2.8, flying over the whole territory of Israel within eight minutes to more than 2.5 Mach speed. In addition, the MiG-25R also has the potential strength to carry two tons of bombs, the Israeli military restless. After all, will not be intercepted and shot down the MiG-25R reconnaissance how many can endure, but will not be intercepted and shot down the MiG-25R bombers is terrible.

7: British Sea Harrier

This is a vertical takeoff and landing of the world’s first carrier-based fighter. After a series of improvements, still in the U.S. Marine Corps service, known as the McDonnell Douglas AV-8 Harrier II Three jet engines similar products with the Soviet Union Yakovlev Design Bureau, the British Aerospace designers developed British products use state-of-the-art Rolls-Royce thrust-vectoring engines, aircraft combat load increased to about 2.3 tons. In the Falklands War, the British Sea Harrier take-off from the local sail 12,000 kilometers war. Shot down 23 aircraft in Argentina as a subsonic fighter aircraft in the air war the Chinese Communists, their zero casualties, achieved excellent victories. In the Falklands War, the British army a total of 20 All experts agree that, if there is no strong support of the carrier-based aviation, the British difficult to win over opponents in the Falklands War.

6: Japan’s Mitsubishi. A6M

This is the mystery of Japan’s Mitsubishi engineers, combines superior mobility performance as the legendary carrier-based fighter of World War II, equipped with powerful weapons, and difficult to combine the characteristics of a record 2600 km voyage, etc., fully embodies the spirit of the Japanese Bushido . Construct such a fighter to fully display the crazy Japanese contempt for the death, no armor, not linked to the external fuel tanks, all payload only fuel and ammunition. . A6M

5: U.S. F-16 fighting Falcon

Better able to explain the superiority of the F-16, against the backdrop of the MiG-29, also can answer many questions. The emergence of the fighter declared, who first discovered the opponent who will have the advantage. Optical horizon has very important significance in combat. In this regard, the F-16 has a greater advantage, the vision of pilots in the cockpit is very good. MiG-29 is a negative factor for the RD-33 engine will produce smoke in the individual flight status, easily rivals found. In close maneuvering combat, the MiG-29 overall layout well, coupled with the use of two engines, and has excellent flight performance, the F-16 on the weaker. For example, the MiG-29 turning speed can reach 22.8 degrees per second, the F-16 is only 21.5 degrees. MiG-29 climb rate of 334 meters per second, the F-16 for 294 meters. Of course, this difference is not particularly large, skilled action can be outstanding pilots to make up.

Front-line fighter air-to-air and air-to-ground weapons with very important, the F-16 have obvious advantages in this regard, the most widely used choice, both guided and unguided bombs, and can also use anti-radar missiles hit the high accuracy . MiG-29 can only use non-guided bombs and uncontrolled rockets. MiG-29 payload is only 2.2 tons, the F-15 is as high as 7.5 tons. The main reason is that the payload of the MiG-29 engine swallowed. Many experts believe that the MiG-29 layout is not reasonable, for front-line fighter, two engines and a little excess. Chief architect do not Elijah Primakov, has admitted that if they have a reliable high-thrust engine, will naturally design a single fighter. In addition, the MiG-29 flight by the impact of the twin design, the maximum range of over 2000 km in the case of the hanging drop tanks, F-16 carry drop tanks were added to the case of two 2000-pound bombs. The maximum range of 3000-3500 km. MiG-29 and F-16 equipped with the same amount of medium-range air-to-air missiles, the Russian R-77 missiles tactical and technical performance is excellent, the U.S. AIM-120 combat performance is relatively low, but the overall performance is completely quite. MiG-29 guns of longer range, larger diameter. But the F-16 uses six cannon, ammunition base 511 hair, much higher than the MiG-29, 150 rounds.

The most important part of the avionics. Although the radar performance advantages and disadvantages of difficult to judge, because the manufacturer will always cover up the exact performance data, but from the personal experience of the pilot’s point of view, the MiG-29 airborne radar horizon angle up to 140 degrees, while the F-16A’s APG- 66 radar and F-16C’s APG-68 radar horizon angle is not more than 120 degrees. The biggest advantage of the MiG-29 pilot helmet with gap-ZUM sights, have a decisive advantage in close air combat. However, the F-16 also has the important advantage, it uses advanced flight control system and engine control systems, aircraft control is very convenient, at any time to complete combat readiness. MiG-29 manual manipulation, into the fight takes a long time.

In short, to solve the same task, the US-Russian design bureau show a completely different approach. MiG-29 and F-16 has an important and constructive design. On the whole, the F-16 is a versatile fighter, the MiG-29 is simply the In the final ranking, the F-16 among the top ten list, MiG-29 defeat is mainly determined by the aircraft actual results. F-16 took part in the war in the Middle East, the Balkans, Iraq and Afghanistan. Especially the long-range raid in 1981, the Israeli Air Force F-16 aircraft 2800 kilometers and destroyed the Iraqi nuclear facilities, no damage, and achieved amazing victories. Overall, NATO countries, Israel, Pakistan, Venezuela, pilots use the F-16 fighter shot down a total of about 50 enemy aircraft. As for the F-16 air combat loss, there has been no clear data. Allegedly, Yugoslav anti-aircraft fire had shot down an F-16 fighters.

4: Soviet MiG -15

MiG -15 single-seat fighter jet since 1949, serving in the Soviet Air Force aircraft to make the most frightened by the Western world in a way can be said that thanks to it only to prevent the outbreak of World War III. MiG-15 high-speed, high-motor fighter even lead to the emergence in the Korean War, the Western media acclaim, the U.S. Air Force headache, crushing all the plans of the U.S. nuclear strike against the Soviet Union, because the U.S. B-29 strategic bombers since then Unable to break through the Soviet MiG-15 fighter air defense. In addition, the MiG-15 jet in the history of the factory, has served in 40 countries.

3: German Messerschmitt Bf.109

There are four kinds of well-known models as the basis for the German Air Force fighter during World War II, E-type is the protagonist of the air strikes the British Isles, the F-type is the vanguard of the bombing of the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941, G – the protagonist of the Eastern Front is the most successful variant of K-type is the enhanced version of the reserve. The German Bf.109 fighter during World War II is the most ferocious, the fastest, most powerful aircraft, is a real fighter.

2: Soviet MiG-21 and F-4

Two interpretations of the Soviet Union and the United States on the face of the second generation of jet fighters MiG-21 and F-4, the former is eight tons of light frontline fighter, which is 20 tons of generic fighter-bomber, was a U.S. Air Force Navy and Marine Corps fighter group. As an irreconcilable opponent, the MiG-21 and F-4 in Vietnam, Pakistan, Iraq, India and Pakistan over in numerous rounds of fierce fighting, was shot down hundreds of planes are still many countries service. MiG-21 advantage of the mobility, F-4 wins and advanced missiles and electronic equipment. However, the actual proof of the inadequacies of both, such as the F-4 to give up the cannon is undoubtedly a mistake, and MiG-21 equipped with only two air-to-air missiles is clearly too little.

1: U.S. F-15 Eagle

F-15 is the real killer of air, 104 air victories, no casualties, to create any kind of modern fighter aircraft are difficult to break the record. F-15 is developed specifically for dominating the air, unbeatable in the decade before the advent of the Su-27. F-15 war June 27, 1979, Israeli F-15 in close maneuvering air combat destroyed five Syrian MiG -21. Advanced fighter in the service career of 30 years, was the F-15 shot down a MiG-21, MiG-23, Mirage F1 five MiG-29). F-15 in Asia has also made great achievements, the U.S. military deployed in Okinawa, 24 F-15 had nine days off 418 sorties during the exercise. Its advanced performance, automatic flight of enemy electronic jamming during the day and night, simple and complex meteorological conditions at high altitude and low effective fighting. U.S. F-15, developed the F-15E combat Eagle attack aircraft, produced a total of 340. The latest modified F-15SE However, no one damaged in aerial combat in the F-15 transcript is suspected that many of life, according to the pilots say, Syria and Yugoslavia, at least 10 F-15 was shot down over Lebanon, Serbia and Syria, but has not produced very convincing evidence. In any case, the F-15 are by far the most successful and most effective fighter, came out on top, well-deserved. (

相关的主题文章：

• Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei
• Afghanistan and Libya.
• 476-952 U.S. dollars
• docked at the port of Tartus .
• 在西部海拔4000米以上地區的高原邊防留下了常年奔波的身影

BEIJING , Feb. 16 , according to Japanese news network reported , a United Airlines aircraft yesterday ( 15 ) afternoon from Hong Kong, China to Chicago , USA on the way , the occurrence of the passengers beat empty brother , aircraft temporary change course , direct flights to Tokyo Narita Airport landing beating the passengers to the airport police .
< - more ->

Japan ‘s Chiba Prefecture Police Headquarters , said yesterday 14:40 Xu , the captain of United Airlines at Narita airport , the serious assault on the machine , you need to come at the Narita airport . 16:30 , the plane landed at Narita airport . Airport police who beat the U.S. men’s charge under the aircraft , passenger aircraft after an hour and a half took off for Chicago .

In the assault , an empty brother was wounded , and the remaining 270 passengers and crew flight attendant was not injured .

Due to this beating incident occurred in the airspace of Japan , the Japanese police do not have the right to punish the Americans beating last night to the Tokyo Regional Immigration Bureau , he was sent back to the United States .

相关的主题文章：

• the scale of thousands rally
• the Obama administration is appropriate
• the co-pilot of the flight panic
• February 11
• Ishikawajima- Harima Heavy Industries held a keel laying ceremony for the helicopter carrier

Global Network reporter Li reported that the February 16 , according to the Associated Press reported that the Thai capital of Bangkok on the 14th , three explosions occurred , injuring five people , including an Iranian attackers , Thailand and the Founder in the investigation . Commander – in – Chief of the Thai police floating Pan ? The dammar Peng will on the 15th , has confirmed that the targets of bombings in Bangkok is the Israeli diplomatic personnel .
< - more ->

Reported that the floating Pan said in a TV interview :

Floating Pan also said that the type of bomb found at the bombing site and embassy attacks in India and Georgia , Floating Pan also confirmed that the two attacks in India and Bangkok, the use of explosives is accompanied by the same floppy disk .

The article also said that the Thai police are still trying to determine that several Iranians are not part of a larger terrorist organization . Reported that the Thai police findings support Israel the previous allegations against Iran .

According to earlier media reports , on the 13th , the staff of the Israeli Embassy in India and Georgia by a car bomb attack , four persons were injured , including the wife of an Israeli diplomat . Israel blamed the attack as Iran , while Iran has strongly denied . Bangkok, Thailand on the 14th series of bombings , Israel accused Iran of behind . However , this argument also been denied Iran .

相关的主题文章：

• Iranian media have commented that the domestic nuclear fuel rods
• Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
• one minute after it began pouring rain. Despite the unfavorable weather conditions
• - Greek Deputy Prime Minister
• the Pentagon was forced to plan to cut $ 485 billion budget in the next decade

January 24, U.S. President Barack Obama in the State of the Union trade case against China, almost twice that of the previous government.
<- more ->

January 18, Obama had to comply with international standards; maritime issues or economic and trade issues, China can do whatever they want, the rules in front of country, can be implemented in favorable mercantilist policies, but do not abide by those rules apply to the United States, Europe or other countries.

The above remarks fully reflect the United States has .

So, the so-called

In maritime security, the United States to the so-called U.S. ask other countries to comply with the relevant rules of international law of the sea itself is not a signatory to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

In economy and trade, the United States is trying to transform and use the existing mechanism of the Asia-Pacific region, to establish their own dominant position in the region. Recently, the U.S. vigorously promote the United States intends to transform it into a high quality and binding enterprise

In terms of military strategy, January 5, Obama’s a rare person at the Pentagon, the new military strategy report. The report, entitled To this end, the U.S. Navy senior officials claimed that the future will be one-third of U.S. naval forces deployed in the western Pacific. Be seen how

In fact, the United States has always taken on the For example, in the climate change issue, the international community well-established principle of

The United States must lower the figure, learn to respect diversity, diversity of the Asia-Pacific region as well as his country’s core interests. More importantly, want to create discord in the Asia-Pacific region and even split practices are outdated and bound to be opposition from the majority of countries in the region.

At present, the international order is undergoing profound changes, the rules of the game will be new areas of Sino-US competition. China should be more proactive, more proactively involved in the formulation of international rules and issues set, and apply the rules to safeguard their own interests. Only in this way, they can more effectively and enhance their own right to speak, and to further enhance the competitiveness of China in shaping the international rules. (Ruan Zongze of this special commentator

相关的主题文章：

• since the pipeline from Syria to the outbreak of anti-government protests have repeated attacks.
• Rome Bid Committee Chairman
• West confrontation .
• Do not attack the United States is now Iraq and Libya
• CATIC stand usher in the senior government officials of countries in Europe

Some people to follow the U.S. officials and scholars talk about the In August 2011, Northrop Grumman announced that the first ship of the U.S. Navy’s next-generation Ford class aircraft carrier Next, the level of the aircraft carrier will be built 11.
<- more ->

The recent news worth noting, January 22, 2012, Plus rushed to the waters of the

It can be seen, some U.S. officials and scholars have thrown the by many factors from the international and domestic constraints, the aircraft carrier and other strategic weapons, while on the road ahead, especially in countries that impose restrictions of the United States.

The United States did not care for the nuclear weapons useless, became the possession of nuclear superpower with nuclear and hold high the nuclear stick. Similarly, the United States is not reasonable But by the first ship of its next-generation aircraft carrier,

Very large

Ford is stepping up the construction of hull number, 40.8 meters wide, the flight deck is 332.8 meters long, 78 meters wide, fully loaded draft of 12.4 meters, a displacement of 100,000 tons, is worthy of the sea.

Why the United States is no longer controversial

In fact, the United States earlier also, like other countries, once fell into the

But the United States that sum up the experience for small and medium-sized aircraft carrier, the large aircraft carriers cost-effective than and combat performance advantage. U.S. Navy statistics to build an aircraft capable of carrying 75 carrier aircraft, large aircraft carriers, and the construction of a medium-sized aircraft carrier of 55 carrier-based aircraft capable of carrying compared to the actual cost of only 8% higher, while the actual shipboard machine sorties have to 1-fold higher.

In addition, small and medium-sized aircraft carrier construction cycle is short, less requirements, but the tonnage is small, airworthiness, a small number of aircraft carrier, the weak capacity of the air defense and antisubmarine warfare, air combat, anti-ship attack is weaker, simply can not meet away from the shore-based operational requirements. Therefore, since the beginning of the 1960s, the United States gradually began to abandon the small pursuing big. The U.S. fleet of 11 aircraft carriers, all of a displacement of 80,000 tons or more of the large aircraft carriers.

Of course, the U.S. abandoned small pursuing big, strong demand for its global dominate the strategy also has its own super economic, technological strength to do the support. However, as the State of the weighing, the large aircraft carrier does is to maintain a large country, powerful interests are necessary. Imagine if the U.S. does not have such a sea. News that the United States Air Sea Battle,

Nuclear Power

As Why the United States is no longer controversial nuclear and often direct the development of nuclear power? The main consideration is the ability of nuclear-powered aircraft carrier life, full life-cycle benefit-cost ratio to be much lower than the conventional steam turbine power. And nuclear-powered aircraft carrier to provide enough power, and conducive to the realization of the full electric propulsion to meet the electricity needs of the electromagnetic, laser high-energy new-concept weapons.

Need to replace it in 50 years of full life-cycle within the core, the equivalent of It provides a powerful driving force, make The 13,800-volt distribution system to provide more than 60 megawatts of electricity, to meet the electric propulsion, electricity demand of an electromagnetic launcher, electromagnetic and laser weapons.

Aboard the new aircraft carrier, four electromagnetic catapult charge would be 16 MW. It is precise regulation in a wide range catapult thrust, interspersed with the ejection of several tons to 40 tons of UAVs, machine, daily average of 160 sorties ejection, peak up to 270 vehicles, such a high energy consumption, the traditional steam turbine can not guarantee that.

Multifunctional

The aircraft carrier is typical to attack, both offensive and defensive, integration of air and sea aircraft carrier.

Why the United States no longer debate on offense and defense, and direct the development of multi-function carrier? In fact, the United States in the development of the carrier, always walk the path very different from the Soviet Union.

The United States insisted on an empty joint naval, integration, emphasizing the collaborative offensive and defensive air and sea to sea to help empty the joint over. While the Soviet Union did not always get rid of the mode of the Air Force and Navy to develop independently, although it stressed that the Air Force cooperative naval counterattack Sea violations, but insists that is the sea the sea, and air to help the sea, collaborative attack and defense.

Construction of aircraft carriers, matching weapons, co-ordinated air, sea, submarine and land combat needs, the Soviet Union highlight the shore-based aviation and carrier-based aviation collaborative unilateral demand to cover the submarine breakthrough in anti-submarine barrier . The Soviet Navy long-term adherence to the

Such as its construction started in 1982, ton, but the basic combat positioning separate offensive and defensive cover submarines. Carrier ship is equipped with a number of offensive and defensive weapons, but compared with the large U.S. aircraft carrier battle group, its consolidated capacity between the larger. Plus the United States stressed that joint air, sea, air and maritime, and participate in the implementation of air-to-sea and submarine warfare aircraft carrier battle group is responsible for regional air defense and anti-submarine, the sea, the camera by the Air Force is responsible for air supremacy, land combat, combat effectiveness is not compared.

Soviet Union deeply the difference between them, started construction in 1988, equipped with a steam catapult take-off, including 80,000 tons, including a variety of fixed-wing AWACS aircraft carrier Ulyanovsk nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, in order to by fixed-wing AWACS enhance the synergy of air and naval forces, thereby increasing the strike capability of the aircraft carrier battle groups. But the collapse of the Soviet Union, the ship’s stop the construction, an end to the expectations vanish into thin air, and also various types of aircraft carrier of the United States so far like a

forces defeated the opponent’s combat guiding ideology has not changed.

Network

If very large, nuclear-powered, multi-function .

platform, online, online weapons, ammunition online and preparedness accessories online, network level and network-centric warfare capability has been a qualitative leap.

For example, do not have the network-centric warfare capabilities, carrier-based aircraft carrier-based aircraft, only in relative isolation from the weapons platform, and its operational effectiveness can only be the number of overlay. The aircraft carrier with network-centric warfare capabilities, such as the F-35B, E/A-18G, E-2D, the MH-60R / S, the X-47B, etc., not only have independent access to information and independent targets, and can also be online to receive information and instructions from the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force and space, space-based platforms.

As a node in the Internet of things, not only to serve the entire network, but also the entire network service. Mount the assault weapons, not only can accept the control of the machine, also available online to accept the control of other authorized users, to fight who, and who to play, and at what time, location, direction, and with what weapons to fight, and are based on the cloud calculate the co-ordination of the network, its timeliness, its validity is not the number of simple superposition can be compared.

Like the X-47B carrier-based unmanned aerial vehicles, will be the edge in combat, reconnaissance, side commanding edge to combat, while assessment of combat effectiveness, and receive online, processing, distribution and application of the above information. Combat support aircraft, such as the MH-60R / S will be able to support operations, according to online information directly on the time-critical targets, high-threat target the implementation of timely blow.

Such as electromagnetic rail guns, modular laser weapons, according to the online destination instructions, implementation of servo attack. 32 MJ railgun, to 2.5 kilometers per second muzzle velocity fired artillery shells at targets within 340 km implementation of the kinetic energy of impact. Multi-module laser used in combination, can directly damage the target.

According to the U.S. Navy’s assessment, one equipped with 75 aircraft carrier Equipped with the same number of aircraft carrier Consider the use of other weapons, and its operational effectiveness

Threat

Of course, the This symmetry operations from the aircraft carrier and carrier point of view, it is uncontested. However, submarines, aircraft carriers, guided missile on the angle of the aircraft carriers and other asymmetric warfare, the threat it faces is not small.

Earlier, the U.S. defense experts pointed out, had hoped to help the US-led oceans half a century, attacks such as the variety of challenges.

Is already in use, orbit and sub-guided anti-ship ballistic missiles, anti-missile system to intercept cruise missiles, the flight altitude is too high; for anti-missile system to intercept ballistic missiles, the flight altitude was too low. Several missiles simultaneously launched, with a wide range of sub-guided warheads destruction, In this sense, the

Just think, whether it is the latest Ford

Similarly, relative to new aircraft carriers to attack the main offensive and defensive, the integration of air, sea, traditional small tonnage, isolated, offshore type, defensive aircraft carrier, if regardless of each other Take spear rifle. Drilled into the obsolete aircraft carrier on the controversy can not get out, should develop aircraft carrier without development, it is in someone else’s trick children! At the expense of another

相关的主题文章：

• Israel mentioned in the November 12 last year
• Structural performance
• we really should take the attitude
• 瘔菜可清熱涼血解毒
• 具有清熱涼血、解毒的作用

<- more ->

U.S. military experts said that, if accurate intelligence of the Taiwan side, which means that the PLA’s 094 strategic nuclear submarine will be this year the full deployment.

According to the Pentagon, military experts said,

As we all know, 094 Jin-class strategic nuclear submarine will carry the

According to the information of the Office of Naval Intelligence,

Accuracy, range ballistic missiles, the most important performance data, and the outside world often changes in the JL-2 range assessments. A written analysis by the Congressional Research Service, Donald Ao Lake:

Launch of China near the protected base,

Emission from the sea south of Japan, goal against in Hawaii (as well as Alaska’s goal);

Emission from the Hawaiian seas west of the middle and be able to combat the multiple states in the western United States (including Hawaii and Alaska);

Emission from the middle of the sea area east of Hawaii, can strike targets within all 50 states.

Another argument is that the Although a range of assessment of the -1 compared to a very large increase.

However, to date there is no more reports confirmed that the

Therefore we can say,

If, as Taiwan’s military has said,

Americans little timid

Western analysts Robert Norris and Hans Kristensen, China already has the development of multiple warheads, and points to guide the multiple warhead technology, but did not choose The deployment of this system.

However, the assessment report, the JL-2 submarine-launched ballistic missiles to take the points lead with multiple warheads, capable of carrying 3-8 warheads, capable of producing 20,90, or 150 tons of TNT equivalent explosive power.

U.S. think-tank the International Strategy and Assessment Center, deputy director Richard Fisher wrote in Jane’s Intelligence Review shape structure with multiple warheads.

The JL-2 multiple warhead technology-offs will comprehensively improve the reliability of China’s nuclear deterrent, because such missiles have more fatal, and able to break through the enemy’s ballistic missile defense system.

094 Jin-class ballistic missile submarines equipped with 12 warheads.

According to the news of the U.S. Department of Defense, is also studying deception, confusion, interference and thermal protection layer device of the missile.

To resolve the missile issue, China’s nuclear submarine will enter the According to the Russian Military Observer reported on January 11, China in recent years, a substantial increase in investment in the Navy submarine force, a large number of new equipment in service.

At the same time, the activities of the Chinese submarine force is becoming more frequent. Among them, 094 strategic nuclear submarines carrying ballistic missiles has been the completion of four, there is a will also be completed in the last few years.

Sources pointed out that the Chinese naval construction companies plan to launch an improved model of the 094 nuclear submarines, to make the missile carried by the number increased to 20. Type 094 submarine 133 meters in length, about 9000 tons displacement.

In addition, a phenomenon can not be ignored is that the Chinese submarine to sea patrols are increasing rapidly.

China’s submarine force is equipped with multi-purpose submarines responsible for defending their own long coastline, but a recent report published by the U.S. military have shown that the performance of Chinese-made submarine is still room for improvement.

Purchase of Kilo-class 636 submarines from Russia, called a muted effect, one of the best submarine in the world today, while Chinese-made submarines in this regard will have to lag behind many – Americans claim that they can even 30 years ago production anti-submarine equipment to detect the submarine.

But in order to find 094 with long-range ballistic missiles, nuclear submarines, will have more difficult. However, some U.S. experts believe that, like the 094 nuclear submarines need to enter in the launch position in the Pacific in order to cover 75-80% of the territory in the United States, their chance will significantly improve this process.

Although the use of the effect may will not be too ideal, but growing superpower China, to maintain an integral part of as Trinity strategic strike force of nuclear submarines is clearly essential choice.

相关的主题文章：

• the person concerned Measures Committee
• accused the British to increase the military deployment in the Malvinas Islands
• Freddie Mac
• U.S. $ 3.1 billion
• South Korean prosecutors

Global Network reporter Li reported that the nuclear issue , economic sanctions , the Strait of Hormuz , scientists and other family issues , the United States and the escalating war of words with Iran , the two sides stand on the issue in a series of under the Recently , Iran once again to the U.S. government

According to Iran’s semi-official Fars news agency Media News January 29 , 29, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad accused the U.S. government , saying that the implementation of different parts of the world the spread .

Ahmadinejad said: past U.S. policy does not bring any benefit to the people of the world .

Reported that a senior Iranian diplomat also criticized the U.S. government had to speak in the implementation of

相关的主题文章：

• end to hot water
• It is reported that about 2
• 000 troops
• Xieshang Wei
• some Chinese officials temporarily missing.